SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 477

T.S.DOABIA
Mohd. Mustafa Khan – Appellant
Versus
Gulam Raoof – Respondent


ORDER

T.S. Doabia, J.

1. A suit was filed by respondents Nos. 1 to 3 for declaration. It was also pleaded that the claim of the present petitioner on the basis of Will is of no consequence and it does not affect the right of the plaintiff/respondents Nos. 1 to 3.

2. An application was preferred by the petitioner for trying issue regarding valuation and Court's jurisdiction as preliminary issues. In the application so filed the value on the house property was put at Rs. 4 lacs. After this, written statement was also filed. The petitioner pressed and made a prayer for trying the issue regarding jurisdiction as preliminary issue. The trial Court declined the prayer holding that this is a mixed question of law and fact. Against this order, a revision was filed. There was another matter also regarding which grievance was made. Case was sent to the trial Court. The trial Court did not interfere. The net result is that the issue in question was treated as an issue which could not be decided unless and until evidence is recorded.

3. It be seen that the law with regard to the question as to which issue is to be tried as a preliminary issue has been settled by the Full Bench of this Court in 197



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top