R.S. Garg, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 18-3-1994 passed in Civil Suit No. 2-A of 1991, by the learned Sixth Additional Judge to the Court of the District Judge, Jabalpur, decreeing the plaintiffs' suit, the defendants have filed the present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The brief facts leading to the case are that the plaintiffs filed a suit alleging that the suit property was purchased by them on 23-10-1986. Defendant No. 1 was in occupation of the ground floor as licensee of Smt. Kripawatibai. The plaintiffs further allege that one Usha Rani was the niece of Kripawati, the said Usha Rani was kept as a licensee in the premises so that she could look after Smt. Kripawati. After the death of Usha Rani, defendant No. 1, with his sons, namely, Arjun Singh and Ajit Singh, was in occupation of the premises. The plaintiffs further contended that on 14-7-1983, defendant No. 1 informed Smt. Kripawati that contrary to the wishes of Smt. Kripawati, defendant No. 1 would not live or reside in the house. The plaintiffs contended that after the sale of the premises, the licence stood revoked. Defendant No. 1 assured vacation of the pre