SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 706

S.K.DUBEY
Permali Wallance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Dubey, J.

1. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order (Annexure P-5) of the Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short the 'Act') directing the petitioners to pay the amount of gratuity of Rs. 8,625/-to respondent No. 4 earned by him during the period of his employment. This order was confirmed by the Appellate Authority under the Act, vide order dated September 6, 1991 (Annexure P-6) passed in Gratuity Appeal No. 6/BPL/90.

2. Facts giving rise to the petition are thus - The petitioner is an Engineering Industry engaged in manufacturing and sale of insulated material, Fibre Glass Engineering components etc. Respondent No. 4 was employed as a workman, who vide order dated August 2, 1986, was dismissed, after holding a domestic enquiry from service on a charge of misconduct under Clause 12(1)(m) of the Statutory Standing Orders, framed under M.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961. Against the order of said dismissal the respondent No. 4 raised an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication of Labour Court No. 2 at Bhopal, which is still awaiting its fin






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top