SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 1012

S.C.PANDEY
Hiru – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.C. Pandey, J.

1. This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order dated 3.12.1990 passed by the Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation in Case No. 18AVCA/NF/88 whereby the appellant's claim for compensation was dismissed by him on the ground of limitation.

2. The appellant claimed that he was an employee of the respondent. He met with an accident on 13.8.1986 during the course of employment. As a result of the accident, the appellant lost his right foot which had to be amputated. The services of the appellant were terminated by order dated 28.3.1987 on the ground that he was medically unfit. The appellant filed an application for compensation on 13.10.1988. The application should have been filed by 13.8.1988. It appears that the appellant also filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of two months for not filing the claim within a period fixed for limitation. The claim for compensation worth Rs. 65,975/- was dismissed by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Durg as there was no sufficient cause in the opinion of the Commissioner for filing the ap







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top