SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 927

A.R.TIWARI, N.K.JAIN
Keshrimal Bapulal (Huf) And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.R. Tiwari, J.

1. These miscellaneous civil cases, filed under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"), are heard as connected, matters and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 120 of 1989 arises out of the order dated January 2, 1987, passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A. No. 743/Ind/85, for the assessment year 1980-81 and is connectible with the application presented under Section 256(1) of the Act and registered as R.A. No. 45/Ind/87 decided on December 2, 1988. In this case, the following questions are proposed :

" (i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the family arrangement in the instant case amounted to a partial partition covered by Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act ?

(ii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that even the genuine family settlements which had not the effect of avoiding tax were also covered by the provisions of Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act ?

(iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top