S.K.DUBEY, U.B.SHUKLA
Anju Mukhi And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Bhatia – Respondent
1. This is an appeal by the claimants for enhancement of compensation awarded in M.C.C. No. 1/89 vide award dated 1-9-1992 passed by Vth Additional Judge to the Court of the District Judge, Bhopal.
2. The facts relevant to this appeal are these. One Avinash Mukhi, aged about 30 years, husband of appellant No. 1 and father of appellant No. 2 was employed as a Medical Representative with UNICHEM Laboratories Limited, Bombay, and was drawing a salary of Rs. 3,312/- per month plus Rs. 25/- per day as City allowance, died on 10-2-1985 in a motor accident. He left behind the widow, appellant No. 1 aged about 29 years and minor son aged about 3 years and father Shri Harichand Mukhi aged about 75 years, who filed an application under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, on 4-4-1985 and claimed compensation of Rs. 12,33,000/- for the death of Avinash Mukhi caused in the motor accident. During the pendency of the proceedings before the Tribunal the appellant No. 1 widow, remarried on 18-8-1985 with Sunil Mukhi, younger brother of the deceased. Father, applicant No. 3 also died during the pendency of the proceedings accordingly his name was deleted from the array of the applicant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.