SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 428

R.S.GARG
Nainsukh Kishandas – Appellant
Versus
Manish Choudhari – Respondent


ORDER

R.S. Garg, J.

1. The copy of the plaint filed as Annexure A-1 with the revision memo seeks certain reliefs, that the land in dispute be declared to be of ownership of the plaintiffs, the defendants be restrained from interfering with plaintiffs possession, and it be further declared in favour of the plaintiffs that the sale deed executed in favour of defendant No. 1 by defendant No. 2 on 5-11-1996 does not convey any title in his favour. The plaintiffs have valued the suit at Rs. 300/- for declaration Rs. 300/- for another declaration and Rs. 300/- for injunction. They accordingly paid court fees of Rs. 90/-. The suit was filed in the court of Civil Judge Class-II. The defendants after putting in their appearance, moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC requesting the Court to reject the plaint on the ground that neither the suit was properly valued nor proper Court fees was paid. The learned trial Court by the order impugned observed that as the plaintiffs are seeking a declaration that the document in dispute does not convey any title in favour of the defendant No. 1 they have to value the claim as the value of the sale deed and must pay the Court Fees ad-valorem on th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top