C.K.PRASAD
Dudhnath Hukum Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Mahadeo Sangewar – Respondent
C.K. Prasad, J.
1. This is defendant's second appeal Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff-respondent filed suit for eviction of the tenant on the ground that tenant has acquired vacant possession of accommodation suitable for his residence, the accommodation in question requires to be reconstructed, which is not possible without the eviction of the tenant and the landlord requires the suit premises for its bona fide need which are grounds for eviction Under Section 12(1)(i)(g) and (e) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) respectively. Civil Judge, Class II, Bilaspur by judgment and decree dated 22-8-1994 passed in Civil Suit No. 127-A of 1994 decreed the suit after recording the finding in favour of the plaintiff on all counts. Tenant preferred appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree. Sixth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur by judgment and decree dated 27-9-1996 passed in Civil Appeal No. 18-A of 1996 maintained the decree of the trial Court on the grounds enumerated Under Section 12 (1)(i) of the Act, but reversed the finding of the trial Court in relation to the other two grounds. Aggrieved by th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.