SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 498

C.K.PRASAD
Dudhnath Hukum Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Mahadeo Sangewar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

C.K. Prasad, J.

1. This is defendant's second appeal Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff-respondent filed suit for eviction of the tenant on the ground that tenant has acquired vacant possession of accommodation suitable for his residence, the accommodation in question requires to be reconstructed, which is not possible without the eviction of the tenant and the landlord requires the suit premises for its bona fide need which are grounds for eviction Under Section 12(1)(i)(g) and (e) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) respectively. Civil Judge, Class II, Bilaspur by judgment and decree dated 22-8-1994 passed in Civil Suit No. 127-A of 1994 decreed the suit after recording the finding in favour of the plaintiff on all counts. Tenant preferred appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree. Sixth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur by judgment and decree dated 27-9-1996 passed in Civil Appeal No. 18-A of 1996 maintained the decree of the trial Court on the grounds enumerated Under Section 12 (1)(i) of the Act, but reversed the finding of the trial Court in relation to the other two grounds. Aggrieved by th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top