S.S. Jha, J.

1. In M.C.C. No. 302 of 1996 this Court passed an order and directed the Claims Tribunal to hold an inquiry whether one Babloo Pal, who filed claim petition, is not the son of the deceased and his sister Ramko has impersonated herself as the daughter of deceased Patiram, named Sukhi. This court further directed to enquire whether these claimants have succeeded in receiving the interim compensation.

2. A petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed in the name of Babloo Pal and Sukhi. The Tribunal allowed the application. The appeal against the award was dismissed by this Court. Subsequently, the daughter of the deceased moved an application before the Claims Tribunal that she is the daughter of deceased and claimants have impersonated themselves and received the claim. Therefore, this Court in a review petition filed by insurance company directed an inquiry and it also ordered that since the allegations have been made against the counsel of the claimants, the Tribunal was directed to enquire into that aspect also. The court further ordered that on completion of inquiry if the allegations made in the application are found to be correct then