SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 401

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Munnibai W/O Jagdish Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish S/O Bhagirath Rathore – Respondent


ORDER

S.P. Srivastava, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the trial Court rejecting her application filed Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeking a direction to the husband/plaintiff to pay an amount of Rs. 2,500/- per month towards interim maintenance together with an amount of Rs. 3,000/- to meet the expenses of the proceedings liable to be incurred in the litigation, the defendant/wife has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned order.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the defendant/wife-applicant as well as the learned counsel representing the

plaintiff/husband-respondent, and have carefully perused the record.

3. The facts in brief shorn of details, and necessary for the disposal of this revision lie in a narrow compass. The plaintiff/husband has filed a petition on 1-7-1997, Under Section 13 of the Act, praying for a decree of divorce. Admittedly the plaintiff had been married with the defendant according to the Hindu rites nine years ago and from their wedlock, three children (two sons and one daughter) were born. The eldest son was aged about 7 years, the second was







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top