A.K.MATHUR, DIPAK MISRA
Muku Bai – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
A.K. Mathur, C.J.
1. Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of the orders of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 16-10-1996 and 24-1-1997 passed in W. P. No. 2473/96 and W. P. No. 3890/96 respectively; therefore, they are disposed of by this common Judgment.
2. L.PA. No. 225/96 is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16-10-1996 passed in W. P. No. 2473/96 and the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition relying on his earlier decision given in the case of Dhumadandhin v. State of M.P., 1997 (2) MPLJ 175.
3. The brief facts giving in LPA No. 225/96 are taken into consideration. A notice to convene the meeting of the Gram Panchayat to consider the no confidence motion against the petitioner was given on 16-5-1996. It is averred that on the basis of the aforesaid notice the prescribed authority fixed the date of meeting for 17-6-1996 and on the said date, no confidence motion was carried out by the required majority. Therefore, a petition (W.P. No. 2473/96) was filed challenging the passing of no confidence motion on the ground that the meeting was convened after expiry of 15 days under Rule 3(3) of the M.P. Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.