SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 623

A.K.MATHUR, DIPAK MISRA
Muku Bai – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. Mathur, C.J.

1. Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of the orders of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 16-10-1996 and 24-1-1997 passed in W. P. No. 2473/96 and W. P. No. 3890/96 respectively; therefore, they are disposed of by this common Judgment.

2. L.PA. No. 225/96 is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16-10-1996 passed in W. P. No. 2473/96 and the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition relying on his earlier decision given in the case of Dhumadandhin v. State of M.P., 1997 (2) MPLJ 175.

3. The brief facts giving in LPA No. 225/96 are taken into consideration. A notice to convene the meeting of the Gram Panchayat to consider the no confidence motion against the petitioner was given on 16-5-1996. It is averred that on the basis of the aforesaid notice the prescribed authority fixed the date of meeting for 17-6-1996 and on the said date, no confidence motion was carried out by the required majority. Therefore, a petition (W.P. No. 2473/96) was filed challenging the passing of no confidence motion on the ground that the meeting was convened after expiry of 15 days under Rule 3(3) of the M.P. Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top