SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 569

S.C. Pandey, J.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
vs
Mulayam Bai And Ors.
Decided on : 3 August, 1998

Admissibility of certificate from the Licensing Authority as a public document under Section 74(1)(iii) of the Evidence Act

Headnote:

Omission - Evidence - Admissibility of certificate from Licensing Authority

Fact of the Case:

The applicant/petitioner raised concerns about an omission in the impugned order and the admissibility of a certificate from the Licensing Authority regarding the existence of a license.

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the admissibility of the certificate from the Licensing Authority as a public document under Section 74(1)(iii) of the Evidence Act. It also directed the applicant/petitioner to produce the original record of the criminal case for acceptance of a copy of the driving license.

Issues: Admissibility of certificate from Licensing Authority, acceptance of photocopy of driving license

Ratio Decidendi: The certificate from the Licensing Authority is admissible as a public document, and the applicant/petitioner can provide the original record of the criminal case for acceptance of a copy of the driving license.

Final Decision: The M.C.C. is dismissed with the aforementioned observations.

JUDGMENT

S.C. Pandey, J.

1. Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner is heard on the question of admission.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is omission in the impugned order dated 9.7.1998, passed in Civil Revision No. 83 of 1998 because it was not put to the court that the Licensing Authority, Alwar is also sought to be examined for proving that no such licence was issued by it as was sought to be proved by the driver of the vehicle. The learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner does not dispute the fact that the licensing authority itself has issued a certificate to the effect that no such licence, as filed in the case by the driver of the vehicle, exists in the record of the Licensing Authority, Alwar. Such a certificate is admissible in evidence as a public document under Section 74(1)(iii) of the Evidence Act. The certificate is the record of the act done by the public officer, who has found, after examining itself its own record, that the licence does not exist. This can be proved by producing the original certificate in the court.

3. The second grievance of applicant/ petitioner is that the trial court has held that the photocopy of the driving licence could not be taken on record. The applicant/ petitioner is free to call for the record of original Criminal Case No. 1834 of 1997, wherein a copy of licence has been filed. After production of original record of the criminal case a copy of that document may be accepted by the Claims Tribunal.

4. With the aforesaid observation, this M.C.C. is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top