J.G. Chitre, J.

1. The grievance made by the petitioners is that the Court was pleased to re-call the defendant Manaklal for the purpose of his examination in respect of some documents. However, a request was made for the purpose of re-calling the petitioner for asking him some questions in respect of mutation entries, effected in the property register maintained by the Municipal Council, Mandsaur. Shri Bhatnagar submitted that on account of this order, injustice is being caused to the present petitioners as it is studded with discrimination.

2. I do not find any substance in the submissions because the Court has pointed out in its Order that there was sufficient opportunity for the petitioners to get the certified copies of the said register and put the questions when he was examined. By pointing out this, the Court has said that the Court did not feel it necessary to call the concerned clerk of the Municipal Council, Mandsaur with such documents and the attesting witnesses of the registered sale deeds.

3. The Code of Civil Procedure contemplates the necessary steps to be taken by the litigant engaged in the litigation at various stages. If the structure of the Civil Procedure C