SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 666

J.G.CHITRE
Indore Development Authority, . . . – Appellant
Versus
Satyapal Anand – Respondent


ORDER

J.G. Chitre, J.

1. The petitioner is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of order which has been passed by 5th Addi tional District Judge, Indore in the matter of Civil O.S. 89-A/89. The said suitwas filed by Shri Satyapal Anand for a decree against the present petitioner, along with Resp. 2- Indore Motor Parts Dealers Association-co-plaintiff in the said suit. As application in view of provisions of Order 11. Rule 12 r/w 151, CPC seeking discovery was filed by Resp. No. 1.- Satyapal Anand on 4-2-91 and by that application the discovery was sought in view of Order 11, Rule 12. On 4-2-91 the learned trial Court rejected that application. Resp. 1 challenged that order by presenting Civil Revision No. 42/92. Said revision petition was heard and decided by this High Court by its order dt. 1-2-95 and by virtue of that order the present petltioner-Indore Development Authority was directed to make discovery on or before 3-3-95. It was also made clear that failing to comply with the said directions of making the discovery the present petitioner - I.D.A. was to face legal consequences.

2. Thereafter the matter was dealt with by the trial Court on 17-1-96 after giving man



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top