SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 757

R.P.GUPTA
Vijay Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Dineshchand Bansal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.P. Gupta, J.

1. This is an appeal by the defendant against whom the appellate Court of III Addl. Distt. Judge, Morena in Civil Appeal No. 1-A/96 by judgment dated 20-7-95 passed a decree that the disputed Gali was joint ownership of the plaintiff/respondent with a right to use it jointly and a further injunction that the defendant will not raise any construction in this joint Gali and defendant will not obstruct the plaintiff from opening his doors and windows in this Gali and a direction to remove whatever wall or construction has been raised by the defendant. By this judgment the appellate Court has reversed the judgment of Addl. Civil Judge Class I, Morena in case No. 102-A/92 decided on 20-7-95. The trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff which was for the relief now granted by the appellate Court. The suit was filed on 10-4-89.

2. It was a simple suit in respect of a portion described as disputed Gali by red colour in the site plan filed with the plaint. The claim was that the plaintiff purchased the adjoining land enclosed with green colour lines in that plan from Savitribai vide sale deed Ex. P-1 on 17-7-88. In this sale deed all the rights belonging to Savit
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top