K.L.PANDEY, P.V.DIXIT
Nathulal Chhotelal Shellac, Factory – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax – Respondent
Pandey, J.
1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution' is directed against certain orders passed and action taken by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur, whereby he declined to entertain second appeals against orders of assess-taewt of sales tax on the ground that, under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (2 of 1959), the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, had jurisdiction to entertain, such appeals.
2. For brevity, the details of the various assessment orders, first appeals, second appeals and action taken to regard to second appeals are given in the following table :
Period of assessment
Date
Date of order in first appeal
Date of second appeal and action taken
1.
19-10-1932
to
6-11-1953
22-9-1956
1-4-1961
20-10-1961 returned
2.
7-11-1953
to
26-10-1954
29-12-1956
1-4-1961
20-10-1961 returned
3.
27-10-1954
to
14-11-1955
24- 4-1958
10-1-1959
Transmitted to the Board of Revenue
4.
15-11-1955
to
2-11-1956
31-8-1960
27-12-1960
4-10-1961 returned
3. Prior to the commencement of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter called the Act on 1 April 1959, the assessees had, under the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, a right to file two
Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1953 SCR 987
Janardhan Reddy v. State, 1950 SCR 940
Garikapatti Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhury, 1957 SCR 488
State of Bombay v. Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., (1960) 3 SCR 640
Ganpat Rai Hira Lal v. Aggarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd., 1953 SCR 752
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.