SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 715

I.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. Miscellaneous – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N. Tiwari for applicant; RS. Parmar, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Arguments on the second bail application under section 439 of CrPC of the applicant Harisingh heard. The applicant is involved in Crime No.140/2011of Police Station- Tukoganj, Indore registered under section 381 of the IPC.

2. The first bail application of the applicant was dismissed as not pressed on 27.4.2011 in M.Cr.C. No. 2959/2011.

3. It has been argued by the applicant's counsel that the charge was framed on 2.5.2011 and since then, no evidence has been produced by the prosecution up-till-now. Hence he should be released on bail under section 437 (6) of the CrPC.

4. The respondent has opposed the bail application.

5. Considered the circumstances. The charge was framed on 2.5.2011 and the case was fixed for prosecution evidence on 16.5.2011, hence according to section 437 (6) of the CrPC, trial of the applicant had to be completed within 60 days from 16.5.2011. Up-till-now, trial has not been completed and no evidence has been produced before the Trial Court by the prosecution. Under these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail.

6. Hence, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the applicant be released on bail subject to his furnishing a person

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top