SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 388

G.D.SAXENA
Atul Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Aparna Shrivastava – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P. Singh for petitioner; Mukund Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 State.

ORDER

1. This petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against an order dated 25th September, 09, passed in Criminal Revision No. 277/09 by the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior setting aside thereby the order dated 06th August, 09, passed in Criminal Case No. 2480/08 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gwalior, permitting the revisionist to file the documents alongwith the application under section 91 of CrPC. dated 25th November 2008 filed in the trial at the stage of defence evidence. Hence, it is prayed that the impugned order passed by the revisional Court to be set aside restoring the order passed by the trial Magistrate.

2. The facts, in short, just for the decision of this petition are that on a private criminal complaint filed by the respondent No.1stating that the accused for want of illegal demand of dowry, caused mental and physical harassment to the complainant, the Magistrate issued the directions for registration of the FIR for commission of offence under sections 498A and 506B of IPC. against accused-petitioner, i.e. husband and his father-in-law, sister-in-law, uncle-in-law, aunt-in-law. After completion of usual inve












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top