SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Arun Mishra, J.
Pran Nath Patel
Vs.
Secretary, Madhyamic Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal
W.P. Nos. 1074, 1078, 1073, 1059, 1042, 1041, 981, 956, 931, 826, 999, 979 and 978 of 2002
Decided On: 27.02.2002

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: P.N. Patel
For Respondents/Defendant: H.S. Gangwani

The central legal point established in the judgment is the paramount consideration of the sanctity of the education system and the right to education, as well as the importance of considering the welfare of students and prevailing social circumstances in determining examination center locations.

Headnote:

Examination Centers - Right to Education - MCC No. 203/2001, Para 8(k), 8(l), 8(m), 8(n), 8(o), 8(p), 8(q), 8(r), 8(y)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought relief for the conduct of examinations at a reasonable distance due to the distant placement of examination centers, causing inconvenience and posing challenges for the students.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Board's decision to fix examination centers at a district headquarter without considering the convenience of students and the problem of 'law and order' was arbitrary and interfered with the right to education. The court expressed displeasure at the manner in which the entire exercise was undertaken without prioritizing the welfare of the students.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the inconvenience caused by distant examination centers, the impact on the right to education, and the failure of the Board to consider the students' welfare and prevailing social circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the paramount consideration of the sanctity of the education system and the right to education. It highlighted the guidelines issued in MCC No. 203/2001, particularly Para 8(k), 8(l), 8(m), 8(n), 8(o), 8(p), 8(q), 8(r), and 8(y), which focused on the distance between schools and examination centers, prevention of mass copying, and the welfare of students.

Final Decision: The court refused to interfere in the matter but directed the respondents to consider the 'law and order' problem while prioritizing the welfare of the students. All the writ petitions were disposed of with costs on parties.

ORDER

Arun Mishra, J.

1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking the relief for conduct of examination at a reasonable distant place. In most of the cases, the centers have been fixed for the students at about 100 kms.; in some of the cases the distance is about 20-25 kms.

2. The case of the petitioners is that most of the schools of which the centers have been fixed at distant places at District Headquarter at Rewa; villages are far flung and interior villages, and the respondent/Board has fixed the examination center at Rewa bus travel from one side is 4 to 5 hours, it would not be possible for most of the students to attend the examination which has to commence for three weeks. It is also submitted that the action of the respondent/Board has the effect of defeating right of education itself. The examination opportunity has to be afforded at such a place which is within the reasonable distance which distance can be covered by the students in reasonable time on the day of examination. It is also submitted that all the students cannot stay at Rewa; large number of students are girls; they shall also be harassed in the process and it would be difficult for the examinees to manage for the stay at Rewa; during the course of examination the higher secondary examination is to commence from 1st and to conclude on 23rd of March; the examination of high school is to commence from 2nd of March and to conclude on 21-3-2002. Long stay for the students at Rewa shall pose various difficulties of residence and shall also create problem in their proper studies. The action of the Board is arbitrary, illegal and unduly interferes with the right to obtain education itself which is fundamental right and is deeply connected with the right to life itself as it is the education which makes the quality of life.

3. On behalf of the Board of Secondary Education, M.P. written submissions have been filed in which it is contended that Board examination of class Xth and XIIth are starting from 1st and 2nd March; all arrangements have been completed in relation to fixation of centers; admission cards have been issued to all the educational institutions recognised by the Board at the end of January, 2002. Question papers have been sent to all the centers in advance and are in safe custody of the nearest police station to the centers. They have been sent in the bundle for the concerned center which has been fixed for the examinees; number of examinees have been considered while preparing the bundles of answer sheets as well as question papers.

4. A letter has been produced by the Board issued by the State Government in which following directions have been issued on 26th March, 2002:-

(i) From the district headquarters the centers should be shifted to the tehsil headquarters duly considering the directions issued by Hon'ble High Court on 29-3-2001;

(ii) If it is not possible to manage invigilators by school education department employees, the arrangement should be done through the lecturers of higher education department;

(iii) Sufficient police arrangements should be made at the new examination center.

5. Pursuant to the directions issued by the State Government, Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, M.P. Bhopal had written a letter to Collector District, Rewa on 26th February, 2002 itself which has also been produced by Shri H.S. Gangwani, Divisional Officer appearing for on behalf of Board. Information has been sought from the Collector District Rewa to the following effect:-

(i) that only two days remains in commencement of the examination as such how many students can be accommodated at a particular new proposed center should be specified; while sending the proposal the capacity, availability of the police and the distance from the schools in which the center is proposed should also be specified;

(ii) the District Administration has to undertake that they shall not allow mass copying and the name of invigilators of higher education department should




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top