SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 285

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Harish chandra – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Dwivedi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: M.S. Tahilramani
For Respondents/Defendant:Ajay Mishra, Senior Advocate with Ankit Saxena

ORDER

A.K. Shrivastava, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13-8-2002 passed by 10th Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 84-A/2002, whereby the application for issuance of temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff has been rejected, this appeal has been preferred by plaintiff under Order XLIII, Rule l(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2. A suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect to Plot No. 3, situated in Khasra No. 255 of village Narela Shankri, P.H. No. 19, Tahsil Huzur, District Bhopal has been filed by the plaintiff praying therein a declaration that he is owner of the suit land. Further a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction is sought against the defendants and in favour of plaintiff thereby restraining the defendants from interfering with the physical possession as well as in construction activities of the plaintiff over the suit plot either himself or through his associate, agent, employees etc.

3. During the pendency of the suit, an application for issuance of temporary injunction under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2, Code of Civil Procedure has also been filed by the plaintiff praying therein that till disposal of th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top