Arun Mishra, J.

1. The petitioner was appointed as Block Resource Centre Co-ordinator Sohawal, District-Satna in Rajiv Gandhi Prathmik Shiksha Mission. He was appointed on 5-10-1995 on contract basis initially for a period of one year. The services of the petitioner were continued after expiry of one year and he continued to work till date of his removal i.e. 9-2-2000 on which date District Mission Director terminated the services of the petitioner owing to his work being not satisfactory. Petitioner submits that his annual confidential reports are good; his services were satisfactory; no enquiry was pending against him; he was never informed of dereliction of duty. Thus, order of termination dated 9-2-2000 is illegal, arbitrary and be quashed. By way of amendment, it has been incorporated that after filing of the petition a revision was preferred before the Commissioner, Rewa which has been dismissed by the Commissioner on the ground of want of jurisdiction. It has been held that Commissioner has no jurisdiction to entertain the revision pertaining to a matter of Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission.

2. In the return filed by the respondents Nos. 2 and 3, it is contended that appointme