SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 719

ARUN MISHRA
Kamla Bai – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Panchayat, Jatara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: R.K. Samaiya
For Respondents/Defendant: K.N. Agrawal

ORDER

Arun Mishra, J.

1. The moot question for consideration is whether the order of compulsory retirement of the petitioner is legal and valid and could be passed without the matter being on agenda.

2. The petitioner was working as Sweeper/Scavenger. She was appointed on 13-12-1977. She had completed service of 23 years. Her date of birth was determined in the year 1993 to be 40 years. All of a sudden, the petitioner submits, that without the matter being on agenda, a resolution was passed by the Council on 2-11-2000 ordering the retirement of the petitioner on the allegations that petitioner did not render the services herself and was used to get the work done through other persons by making the payment. The Vice-President and the President of Health Committee have also filed certain complaints; hence it was decided to compulsory retire the petitioner from service. Petitioner submits that though President-in-Council did not pass any resolution on 30-8-2000 with respect to compulsory retirement of the petitioner, however, while confirming the minutes of President-in-Council, the General Council had passed additional resolution under the guise of confirmation of the minutes of the Pre

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top