SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 385

S.C.PANDEY
Sukhlal – Appellant
Versus
Murti Shri. Krishnachand Anandbihariji – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Mr. Ashok Jain, Advocate
For Respondents/Defendant:Mr. J.P. Sanghi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.C. Pandey, J.

1. This appeal, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 12.2.1996 passed by Xth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur (MP.) in Civil Appeal No. 9-A/94, arising out of the judgment and decree dated 21.4.1994 passed by 1st Civil Judge, Class-I, Jabalpur (MP.) in Civil Suit No. 52-A/94.

2. The respondents described themselves in the cause title of memo of appeal as trustees of the Murti Shri Kirshnachand Anandbihariji at House No. 1/393, Kotwali Ward, Miloniganj, Jabalpur a private trust. They claimed that they are the landlords of the accommodation bearing Municipal Corporation No. 279 situate of South Miloniganj, Jabalpur (MP.). They claimed to be the owners and landlords of the aforesaid accommodation. It was stated by them in the plaint that the appellant was the tenant of a part of the aforesaid accommodation on a monthly rent of Rs. 25/- (Rupees Twenty Five) per month. This part was particularly described in the plaint map in red colour and marked by letters ABCDEFGHIJKLM in the plaint map. It was claimed that the tenancy was oral. The respondents alleged in the plaint that the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top