S.S. Jha, J.

1. These two revisions are disposed of by this common order. Civil Revision No. 1193/1998 is filed by the contractor challenging the award passed by the M. P. Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal, Respondents-State has also preferred Civil Revision No. 51/99 challenging the same award passed by M.P. Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal.

2. Facts of the case are that petitioner M/s Rajawat and Company has preferred a claim and raised a dispute before the Arbitration Tribunal. Petitioner claimed that he was required to execute the balance work which was not completed by the original contractor. Measurements of the work carried out by the previous contractor was not finalised by the respondents. The petitioner was not given any instruction pertaining to the work required to be executed by him. Petitioner claimed that immediately after the work order was issued and he started the work, execution of the work was delayed on account of non-supply of the copy of the agreement, drawing, designs specifications and non-finalisation of the work done by the previous contractor. Layout of the administrative block was delayed and after completion of foundation, respondents had issued instructions