N.P. Singh, J.

1. This revision is being disposed of at the admission stage upon the consent of the parties.

2. This revision application is directed against the order dated 16.1.95 passed by the Sessions Judge, Panna in criminal appeal no. 64/94. Whereby he dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction and sentence of the applicant as passed by the Trial Court.

3. The applicant was prosecuted for the offence under Section 25 (1) (b) of the Arms Act, for possessing a Rampuri knife, and was convicted thereunder and sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months and to pay fine of Rs. 250/- in default to undergo R.I. for further two months.

4. The conviction and sentence of the applicant was affirmed by the Sessions Judge, Panna in criminal appeal no. 64/94.

5. Shri Surendra Singh learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the prosecution has not led any cogent evidence, that the knife recovered and seized from the applicant was longer than 9" in length and 2" in width in order to being the offence within the purview of the definition of the Arms, as provided under the Arms. Act.

6. Shri N.S. Ruprah, Dy. Government Advocate has fairly conceded that there is lack of legal evidence