B.M.LAL
Bhagwati Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Chandrabhanu – Respondent
B.M. Lal, J.
1. This plaintiff's appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27-8-84 passed by the Court of Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Chhatarpur, whereby the suit filed by the appellant for declaration that the sale-deed dated 20-5-83 executed by the respondents No. 1 and 2 in favour of respondent No. 3 for the land in dispute, alienated in the man annexed to the plaint, vide letters A-B-C-D, is not binding on the plaintiff and the same be declared void and the plaintiff alongwith respondents No. 1 and No. 2 be declared as owners thereof, has been dismissed.
2. The short facts leading to this appeal are as under : Pandit Rajaram Sharma had three sons, viz., Kalicharan, Durgaprased and Bhagwati Prasad. Chandra Bhanu, respondent No. 1 is the son of Kalicharan. The house in question situate in Chhatarpur, is ancestral property belonging to their common ancestor Atal Pujari and after his death Pandit Rajaram became the owner of the suit house. He died in the year 1967. After his death all his three sons, stated above, succeeded him. Kalicharan, father of Chandra Bhanu died in the year 1969. This ancestral house and the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.