SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 275

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Jagdish Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Daulatram – Respondent


ORDER

1. This is plaintiff second appeal whose suit has been dismissed by learned first appellate Court reversing the judgment and decree passed by learned Trial Court decreeing his suit.

2. No exhaustive statement of facts are required to be narrated for the purpose of disposal of this appeal. Suffice it to say that a suit for eviction on the basis of relationship of landlord and tenant has been filed by the plaintiff/appellant on the grounds envisaged under section 12 (1) (a) and (c) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") against the original defendant/tenant, Baldu, who has died during the pendency of this second appeal and his LRs have been brought on record as respondents arraying them as defendants.

3. Learned Trial Court on the basis of the pleadings of the parties found both the grounds to be proved and decreed the suit on both counts. The appeal which was filed by defendant Baldu has been allowed by the impugned judgment and decree and the suit of the plaintiff/appellant has been dismissed.

4. In this manner this second appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff.

5. This Court on 28.6.1990 admitted the second appeal on the following substantial



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top