SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 558

MARKANDEY KATJU, C.K.PRASAD
Ravikant Bansal – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Rural Road Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Mathur for petitioner.

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 11.3.2011 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior Bench in Ravikant Bansal v. M.P. Rural Road Development Authority [Arbitration case No.4 of 2010, order dated 11.3.2011 (M.P.)]. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on a decision of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. M.P. SEB ¼2011½ 13 SCC 261 decided on 14.1.2010.

3. We are of the opinion that the aforesaid decision is distinguishable because in the present case the arbitration clause itself mentions that the arbitration will be by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal. Hence, in this case arbitration has to be done by the Tribunal.

4. The special leave petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top