1. This order shall also govern the disposal of W.P. No.13515/2010 as in both the petitions question involved is one and the same and also in both the suits the respondent is one and the same.

2. In W.P. No.7670/2011 the order under challenge is dated 14/09/2011 passed by V Civil Judge, Class-II, Ratlam in civil suit No.61-A/2009 whereby the objection raised by the petitioner regarding admissibility of the document in evidence was rejected while in W.P. No.13515/2010 the order under challenge is dated 17/09/2010 passed by IV Civil Judge, Class-II, Ratlam in civil suit No.86-A/2009 whereby objection regarding admissibility of the document was rejected.

3. Short facts of the case are that Shivshanker respondent filed a suit for eviction in W.P. No.7670/2011 under Section 12 (1) (a) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act on 17/01/2002 alleging that petitioner is the tenant in the suit accommodation vide rent note dated 28/02/1995 @ Rs.500/- per month and also deposited a sum of Rs.50,000/- as deposit. It was alleged that since the rent is not being paid and petitioner is in arrears of rent, therefore, a decree of eviction be passed. Shivshanker also filed a suit for eviction against