SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 400

G.D.SAXENA
Shriram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Vijay Sunderam for petitioners; F. A. Shah, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

G. D. Saxena, J. 1. This revision petition under section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is directed against both the orders dated 16th and 21st February 2012 recorded in Sessions Case No. 71/2012, by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior firstly thereby rejecting the application preferred by the petitioners under section 91 of Cr.P.C. and secondly after hearing the prosecution and accused, the charges were framed against all of the accused for commission of offence punishable under sections 365,366 506 Part-II of I.P.C. A charge for commission of offence punishable under section 376(1) of Cr.P.C. was also framed against accused-petitioner Shriram.

2. In short, relevant facts for adjudication of the matter are that on the day of incident, all the accused abducted knowingly or had reason to belief that the victim will be compelled to marry with accused Shriram or intercourse against her will or her wishes and after abduction confined her when she was wearing ornaments of gold and having cash of Rs. 20.000/-, in a secret place. It is alleged that thereafter, at Shivpuri, accused Shriram committed rape on her. It is further stated that all the accused crimi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top