SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 110

M.C.GARG
Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner in person; A.S. Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General for State.

ORDER

1. This is petition filed by the petitioners, who are accused in Criminal Case No.35113/08 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore instituted on a complaint filed by the respondent No.2 (Sunil Grover) under sections 63 and 63B of the Copyright, 1957 (amended 1994) Act (for short ‘the Act’).

2. In fact on the basis of the complaint lodged by the respondent No.2, an FIR was registered in this case being FIR No.258/08. On that basis challan was filed by the prosecution, i.e., by the respondent No.1.

3. Charges are also levelled against petitioner on 6.8.2010. Thereafter a compromise was arrived at between the complainant and the petitioners. Petitioners have filed an application under sections 320 and 320(2) of the CrPC for permission for compromise and to record the compromise arrived at between the parties. However, said application was dismissed by the Court below on the ground that as per Code of Criminal Procedure, offences disclosed were compoundable.

4. Petitioners have approached this Court by filing this petition under section 428, CrPC. They have also placed on record an original Memorandum of Understanding, which has been arrived at between the par













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top