SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 851

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Govind Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Vidhata – Respondent


,e- ih- ‘kqDyk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls( ih- ikfj[k izR;FkhZx.k dh vksj lsA
Advocates Appeared:
M.P. Shukla for appellant
P. Parikh for respondents.

ORDER

1. The appellant-plaintiff has directed this appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 30.9.09 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of Additional District Judge, Mauganj, district Rewa in Civil Regular Appeal No. 13-A/09, whereby allowing the appeal of the respondents Nos. 1 and2, the judgment and decree dated 1.10.08 passed by Civil Judge, Class-I, Mauganj in Civil Original Suit No. 11-A/03 decreeing the suit of the appellant for perpetual injunction refusing the prayer of declaration with respect of the disputed agricultural land, the entire suit has been dismissed.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal in short are that the appellant herein filed the impugned suit for declaration and for perpetual injunction against the respondents contending that initially the disputed land described in the plaint was belonging to the Pawaidar. Under the authority of the Pawai in the year 1921 -1922 one Trivikram Prasad mortgaged the same with possession with his grandfather and since then through his predecessors of the family, he is coming in possession of such land. Subsequent to such mortgage said Pawaidar or his L.Rs.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top