SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 468

ANIL SHARMA
Shravan Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Mh-ds- vxzoky ;kph dh vksj ls( dq- fu/kh ikVudj] mi&ljdkjh vf/koDrk jkT; dh vksj lsA
Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Agrawal for petitioner;
Nidhi Patankar, Dy. Govt. Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 4.12.2009 passed in Case No. Restoration/137/PBR/2009 Board of Revenue MP, Gwalior, this petition is filed by the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal bearing No.A-1608/111/08 was dismissed in default on 3.8.2009 as the petitioner could not reach to the Court due to failure of the vehicle on the way, against which the petitioner filed an application for restoration of the appeal, which has also been dismissed by the said order dated 4.12.2009 on the ground that the petitioner has not filed any bill for repairing of the vehicle and the application could not have been decided only on the basis of the affidavit filed in support of the restoration application.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is allowed, it is directed that Case No. Restoration/137/PBR/2009 Board of Revenue M.P. Gwalior be heard again and a fresh order on merits be passed by the Board of Revenue.

5. The petition is disposed of accordingly.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top