SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 287

SHIV DAYAL SHRIVASTAVA
Jasram Moolchand, Firm – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Ramchandra, Firm – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: G.P. Patankar
For Respondents/Defendant: Motilal Gupta

JUDGMENT

Shiv Dayal, J.

This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure code arises out of a suit instituted by the Respondent against the Appellant for rendition of accounts.

The Plaintiff's case as stated in the plaint was that in Samvat 2002 the Plaintiff dealt in purchasing and selling of Ghee, Sugar, Cotton etc. through the Defendant as his commission agent; that the Defendant did not furnish accounts in spite of repeated demand by the Plaintiff and that afterwards the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a statement of account but the same was not correct. The defence was that the Plaint was vague; that the statement of accounts which had been sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff was correct and that whatever amount had been found due to the Plaintiff had been remitted to him by a cheque dated 2nd August 1949. In the pleadings both the Plaintiff and the Defendant have been described as firms, but it appears that the Plaintiff Keshrimal is the sole proprietor of his business carried in the name and style of "firm Keshrilal Moolchand;" likewise, Badrilal is the sole proprietor of his business named and styled as Ramlal Ramchandra.

The trial Judge held that the Plai































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top