SHIV DAYAL SHRIVASTAVA, P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
Damodar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Nandram Deviram – Respondent
Shiv Dayal, J.
While protecting tenants against their eviction from residential and non-residential accommodation, the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act No. 23 of 1955 (hereinafter called the 1955 Act) permits suits for eviction in certain exceptional circumstances. Those exceptional grounds, e. g. default in payment of arrears of rent, causing of substantial damage, sub-letting, creating nuisance etc. are enumerated in Clauses (a) to (n) of Section 4, which is the prohibitory section. Under Clause (g), in the case of a residential accommodation, and under Clause (h), in the case of a non-residential accommodation, a landlord can sue for eviction of his tenant on the ground of his requirement. Section 4(h) runs thus:
''4. No suit shall be filed in any civil Court against a tenant for his eviction from any accommodation except on one or more of the following grounds;
* * * * *
(h) in the case of non-residential accommodation, that the landlord genuinely requires the accommodation for continuing or starting his own business or that of any person of his family bona fide residing or to reside with him and that he or the aforesaid person of his family 'is not in occupation o
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1955) 2 SCR 603 (632)
Sri Ram Ram Narain v. State of Bombay
Kameshwar Singh v. Dharamdeo Singh
New Piecegoods Bazar Ltd. Bombay v. Commr. of Income Tax, 1950 SCR 553
Sriniwasamurthy v. State of Mysore
Nalinakhya v. Shyam Sunder, (1953) SCR 533
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose, (1953) SCR 1
Commr. of Agricultural Income Tax v. Keshav Chandra, 1950 SCR 435
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.