SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 129

VIJAYVARGIYA
H H MAHARANI USHA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, CITY-II, BHOPAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VIJAYVARGIYA, J. - By this reference under s. 256(1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the heirloom jewellery constituted personal effects within the meaning of section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, therfore, the sale thereof did not give rise to any taxable capital gain ?"

The facts giving rise to this reference, as set out in the statement of the case, are as follows :

The assessee is the ex-Ruler of the erstwhile Holkar State. The assessee was assessed as an individual and the assessment year involved is 1972-73, for which the previous year ended on March 31, 1972. During the accounting year relating to the assessment year in question, the assessee sold two items of heirloom jewellery for Rs. 13,80,001. The assessee claimed that the heirloom jewellery was exempted from the provisions of the W. T. Act by the CBR and, therefore, the sale thereof did not give rise to any taxable capital gains. The ITO negative the contention of the assessee and held that the ass







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top