SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 523

H.G.MISHRA, R.K.VIJAYWARGIYA
Satyalata – Appellant
Versus
Anwarkhan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Mr. B.K. Samdani
For Respondents/Defendant: Mr. M.L. Dhupar

JUDGMENT

H.G. Mishra, J.

1. This is an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 against the award dated 26.3.79 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar dismissing the claim of the Appellants.

2. Facts essential for the decision of the appeal are as under:

The claimant-Appellants submitted on 23.6.1978 an application for compensation under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short, the Act) before the learned Claims Tribunal on the allegations that the claimant No. 1 is wife, claimant Nos. 2 3 and 4 are minor sons and claimant No. 5 is mother of Ramsumaran Pandey, the deceased. It was on 28.12.1977 at about 10 30 a.m. that on a Bullet motor cycle bearing registration No. MPM 6155, driven by Gopaldas (AW6), Sureshchandra (AW2) and Ramsumaran Pandey were sitting one after the other on its pillion. They were going to Anjad. When they came near a culvert between villages Mandwada and Fatyapur, head light of the motor cycle was switched on. It was at this time, that they saw a local passenger bus (bearing registration No. MPF 7498) coming from the opposite direction at a fast speed. The speed of the bus was not lowered down inspite



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top