SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 75

M.D.BHATT
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunnukhan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: R.D. Jain
For Respondents/Defendant: R.D. Sharma

ORDER

M.D. Bhatt, J.

1. This is the revision against the trial Court's Order dated 11-12-79 dismissing the intervener Ashok Kumar's application for being joined as a party in the pending Civil Suit No. 114 of 66 Sunnu Khan v. Basai Khan and others.

2. In a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, partition and possession filed by Sunnu Khan (present non-applicant No. 1) against certain members of his family viz. Basal Khan and others (present non-applicants-defendants No. 2 to 5), temporary injunction had been granted against the defendants, restraining them from interfering with the subject matter viz. the properties in suit. The present applicant Ashok Kumar had purchased some of the lands in suit from the defendants Kasimkhan and Subratikhan (non-applicants No. 4 and 5) during the pendency of the suit. Ashok Kumar having, thus, purchased part of the suit lands, filed the application under Order 22 rule 10 CPC for being joined as a defendant in the suit. The petition was opposed by the plaintiff, that Ashok Kumar could cot be joined in the suit, inasmuch as the purchase of the property by him during the pendency of suit was bit by section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top