SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 409

RAJEEV GUPTA, USHA SHUKLA
Neha Indurkhya – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Tiwari for appellant;
P.D. Gupta, Deputy Advocate General for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Gupta, J.

1. Appellant Ku. Neha Indurkhya has filed this appeal under Clause 10, of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 24.10.2002, passed in Writ Petition No. 4116/2002, whereby petitioner's petition seeking 'revaluation' of her answer-papers of the subjects of English, Physics and Mathematics was dismissed.

2. The appellant appeared in the Final Examinations for Class XII, conducted by respondent Madhya Pradesh Board of Secondary Education in the year 2002.

3. The appeI1ant on her own assessment was expecting very good marks for her performance in the subjects of English, Physics and Mathematics. On receiving her mark-sheet she was shocked to note that she could secure only 12, 18 and 19 marks in the subjects of English (Gen.), Physics (Theory) and Mathematics. The appellant, therefore, applied for 'Retotalling of Marks' in the above mentioned three subjects, by depositing the requisite fee as per the relevant 'Regulation'.

4. The appellant being disappointed and frustrated on account of the non-fructuation of her hopes and expectation, based on self-assessment of her performance in the examination and labouring under an impression that her performance has not been p

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top