SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 654

A.K.MISHRA
Kala – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioner - H.S. Ruprah with S.K. Raghuwanshi
For respondents - Kumaresh Pathak, Government Advocate

ORDER

1. In this petition, petitioner has assailed order (P-1) and appellate order (P-3). Order (P-1) was passed by the Additional District Magistrate. Order (P-3) has been passed by the State of Madhya Pradesh rejecting an appeal preferred by the petitioner. Petitioner's externment has been ordered for one year as per order dated 1.11.2003 from the Districts of Bhopal, Raisen, Sehore, Rajgarh and Hoshangabad, under M.P. Rajya Suraksha, Adhiniyam.

2. It is averred in the petition that petitioner is a businessman and involved in the sale of spectacles. Police has never recorded any FIR against the petitioner in any police station. Petitioner has earned displeasure of the Town Inspector in the year 2003. He has registered two cases in the year 2003 against him. Firs information report dated 14.2.2003 was registered on the complaint of one Annu @ Anwar on the allegation that the petitioner had abused him. On 7.4.2003 another complaint regarding satta (gambling) has been registered. On 9.5.2003, another case of gambling was registered in the same police station Petitioner pleaded guilty in one of the cases. Fine was imposed. On 11.6.2003 another complaint lodged by one Santosh has been










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top