SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 207

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sudha Pandit, Ashish Shroti

JUDGMENT

( 1. ) BY this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner/defendant Nos. 17 (wrongly typed as defendant No. 3 in memorandum W.P.), is challenging the validity of the impugned order dated 15-9-10 passed by learned VI Additional District Judge, Rewa in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 24/2010 whereby temporary injunction application of plaintiff dated 7-8-2006 which has been rejected by the learned trial Court, has been allowed by issuing temporary injunction against the petitioner/defendant No. 17.

( 2. ) IN brief, the case of plaintiff is that he has filed a suit for declaration of Bhumiswami right and injunction against the defendant Nos. 1 to 16 in respect of certain agricultural land the description whereof is mentioned in the plaint. An application for issuance of temporary injunction was also filed by him against these defendants. The State of M. P. and Tehsildar, Rewa have been arrayed as defendants No. 1 and 2 respectively. The application for issuance of temporary injunction against all these defendants 1 to 16 which was allowed on 4-2-2003 by learned trial Court and the order was confirmed in Misc. Appeal No. 75/2004 dated 18-4-2006. The order of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top