SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 284

C.P.SEN, S.AWASTHY
Balkrishan Patel – Appellant
Versus
Brijendra Patel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K. Patel for petitioner;
V.K. Tankha for respondent No.1.

ORDER

C.P. Sen, J.-1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the ad interim order of the Additional Collector dated 6-3-1984 directing the parties to maintain status quo regarding the no confidence motion passed by respondent No 1.

2. The respondent No.1 was an elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Baroda, Tahsil and District Jabalpur. The petitioner is an elected Panch of that Gram Panchayat. The petitioner and nine other Panchas moved a no confidence motion against respondent No.1 which was passed by 10 Panchas present and voting in favour of the resolution on 14-2-1984. There were in all 15 Panchas out of which five remained absent inspite of notice. The respondent No. 1 filed an appeal under section 83 of the M.P. Panchayats Act, 1981 before the Collector, Jabalpur and got an ad interim order. His main ground of attack was that there was no valid service of notice about the meeting on the remaining five Panchas. According to the petitioner, (i) no appeal is provided under section 83 of the Act against a, resolution of no confidence motion, and (ii) in view of section 18 of the Act, respondent No.1 ceased to hold the office of Sarpanch from the date immediately next af



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top