SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(MP) 100

G.L.OZA
Prem Pandhi – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Garg – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
C. R. Khanwilkar for applicants;
K. G. Maheshwari for non-applicant.

ORDER

Oza, J : - 1. This revision petition bas been filed by the petitioners against an order dated 30th October 1978 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Indore directing issue of process in a private complaint filed by the non-applicant against the petitioners under sections 273 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are Directors of the Cad burry India Limited, Bombay and partners of Model Agencies, Indore.

2. The non-applicant-complainant filed a complaint against these petitioners on 18-10-1978 alleging that on 3rd August 1978 complainant purchased a piece of Cadburry chocolate from the shop Super Selection Departmental Stores. New Palasia, Indore owned by one Bharat Kumar Bhandari who has not been joined as an accused but bas been examined as a witness for the prosecution, it was alleged by the complainant that on opening the wrapper he found that red ants were sticking to the chocolate which according to the complainant was unfit for human consumption. It is also alleged that the complainant would not have purchased it if he had known that the chocolate is in that state. After filing of the complaint the complainant examined himself and also Bharat Kumar Bhandari an




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top