SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 383

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI, T.N.SINGH
Chhakki – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Kumar Sharma for appellant
R.A. Roman, Additional Government Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

Shacheendra Dwivedi, J.- 1. By this judgment both the appeals (Criminal Appeal No. 319/83 and Criminal Appeal No. 320/83, challenging the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge, Datia, in Session Trial No. 27/82, dated 29-10-1983, whereby appellant Chhakki of Criminal Appeal No.319/83 and appellant Lalai of Criminal Appeal No. 320/83 have been convicted under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, are being disposed of.

2. According to the First-Information-Report (Ex P-8), lodged by Ramshree (PW 7), on 5-12-1981. at Police Station Indergarh, in village Ekona, in the night of 4-12-1981, at about 8 9 p.m.. Lokman, the deceased, went to the house of Balle (PW 9), as they were sharing the agriculture, for taking money and for saying about diesal. After some time, shouts were heard, "DODIO RE MAR DARO BACHA OO"; and on hearing the shouts. Jagman went to the house of Balle (PW 9). Ramshree (PW 7) also followed Jagman and saw that inside the Paur of Balle (PW 9), marpit of Lokman and Jagman, deceased persons, was done by four accused persons, viz., Lalai, Chhakki, Chhinga and Ramsewek. Chhakki was assaulting by Basula and Lalai by Kulhadi, R




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top