SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(MP) 200

G.P.SINGH, R.C.SHRIVASTAVA
Madhosingh, In re: – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Claimant: Sohan Chaudhary.

JUDGMENT

G.P. Singh, C.J.

1. This is a reference made by the Commissioner for workmen's compensation under section 27 of the workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The facts, briefly stated, are that one Amar Singh was employed as a temporary Mate in the Central Railways. Amar Singh died on 16th April 1971 as he was knocked down by a railway engine while on duty. The Divisional Accounts Officer, Central Railway, deposited Rs.6,000 as compensation on the death of \mar Singh. The only dependent as defined under section 2 (d) of the Act left by the deceased was his widowed mother who also died before she could file any claim application. The widowed mother left behind as her heir Madho Singh, Madho Singh is a brother or the deceased Amar Singh but be is not a dependent as defined in the Act. Madho Singh applied to the Commissioner for payment of compensation. On these facts the Commissioner has referred the following questions of law for our answer:-

(1) Whether the heir of a deceased dependent can claim the amount deposited as compensation under the W.C. Act 1923 even though dependant dies before he or she could file a claim before Commissioner for workmen's compensation and before compensa





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top