SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 137

G.P.SINGH, U.N.BHACHAWAT
Sharma & Co. Bilaspur – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.S. Dharmadhikari for petitioner
M.V. Tamaskar, Government Advocate for State

ORDER

G.P. Singh, -1. The petitioner took an excise contract for sale of country liquor for a consideration of Rs. 4,81,000/- in an auction for the year 1978-79. Under the terms of the licence granted to the petitioner it was required to lift 548 proof litres of Masala liquor and 1608 proof litres of plain liquor ill each quarter from the warehouse. The petitioner committed breach of this condition, Consequently the Collector imposed penalty amounting to Rs.15,452/- which is being recovered from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner challenges the said demand.

2. Section 17 of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 provides that no intoxicant shall be sold except under the authority and subject to the terms and conditions of licence granted in that behalf. Section 18 enables the State Government to lease to any person amongst others the right of selling by whole sale or by retail any liquor intoxicating drug within arty specified area Section 27 empowers the State Government to accept payment of a sum in consideration of the grant of any lease under section 18. It is under these provisions that excise contracts for sale o





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top