SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 161

A.K.MATHUR, S.K.KULSHRESTHA
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Appellant
Versus
HOTEL CHANDELA. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This is an application under section 44(2) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act at the instance of the Revenue for calling reference from the Board of Revenue.

2. It is not necessary to give detail facts. Suffice it to say that the assessee maintains a five star hotel at Khajuraho wherein apart from boarding and lodging other facilities like swimming pool, health club, bar, golf course, conference hall, etc. The assessee was assessed to tax by the Sales Tax Officer under the provisions of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and that was challenged before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Satna, and he failed in it. Thereafter, the assessee preferred second appeal before the Board of Revenue. The Board of Revenue set aside the orders of both the authorities below and found that the assessee was not liable to pay the tax and also directed the refund of the tax so deposited by the assessee. Hence, an application was made by the Revenue for referring the case before this Court, but that application was rejected by the Tribunal. Hence, the Revenue has approached this Court under section 44(2) of the Act for calling the reference.

3.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top