These are applications in revision by the witnesses against whom, it has been ordered, by the Sessions Judge, under Sec. 479-A Cri. Pro. Code, after hearing their cause, that complaints should be filed in respect of certain statements by them in Sessions Court and in the Committing Court, both of which could not be true, and one of which was necessarily false, and that within the knowledge of the deponent.

2. These arise out of Sessions Case 35 of 1959 of Indore District. The learned Sessions Judge has referred to passages in their evidence before the committing court and before the Sessions Court itself, and has described them as "blatantly contradictory". These very passages will form part of the respective complaints. In effect, they stated in the Court of commitment that they saw one of the accused persons at the scene of the murder with a weapon in his hand, and that he asked them not to come near as they were paying off old scores.

In the sessions Court they said that they did not see this accused at that place, and he did not tell them that they should proceed no further. Each of the applicants stated in the Sessions Court that what he was telling there was the truth, and