SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 620

G.D.SAXENA, S.K.GANGELE
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ramji Das Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Khedkar, Deputy Advocate General for appellants/State; B.P. Singh for respondent.

ORDER

Saxena, J. 1. Assailing the order dated 24.1.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.5119/2010 (S), the present appeal has been preferred under section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005.

2. It is admitted that respondent Ramji Das Agarwal at the time of retirement was working as Executive Engineer in Water Resources Department and he after completing the age of superannuation retired on 31.8.2009. It is also admitted that after retirement, GPF amount was paid to the respondent on 4.1.2010, GIS amount was paid on 6.2.2010 and family welfare fund was paid on 25.2.2010. The gratuity, full pension, leave encashment, arrears of pay revision, etc. were not paid to the respondent till the date of order dated 24.1.2012 passed in WP No. 5119/2010.

3. The contention of the learned Deputy Advocate General is that the matter of the retiral benefits of the respondent was pending before the Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension with regard to the fixation of the Respondent, therefore, there was no such delay on the part of the appellants/State authorities to clear all the retiral dues of the respondent. Hence, the direct
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top