1. By filing this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners have challenged the orders, Annexure P/1 and P/2. The petitioner earlier filed an application Order 26 Rule 10 CPC and section 45 of the Evidence Act with a request to appoint an hand writing expert to inquire about the singnature of defendant Shabbir Khan. The said application of the petitioners was rejected by the Court below on 18.10.2012 merely on the ground that the said application was not supported by an affidavit. It was further opined that such application can be entertained at a later stage. Then petitioner filed another application on the same subject which was duly supported by an affidavit. This application is also rejected by order dated 6.11.12 (Annexure P/1). The Court below opined that earlier application was not rejected only because it was not supported by the affidavit, it was also rejected for the reason that this prayer can be entertained at a later stage i.e. after recording the evidence of the plaintiff.

2. It is interesting to note that during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the respondent Shri Mangal submits that he has no objection if handwriting expert’s o